📋 Key Information Summary
- Older adults (≥65 years) frequently under-report or mask acute pain due to stoicism, fear of hospitalisation, or belief that pain is a normal part of ageing — always use validated observational tools in addition to self-report scales.
- Atypical pain presentations are common: acute coronary syndrome may present as dyspnoea or confusion rather than chest pain; intra-abdominal catastrophe may present as restlessness alone.
- Cognitive impairment (dementia, delirium) does not mean the patient cannot experience pain — use behavioural observation tools such as PAINAD, Abbey, or ABBEY scale to assess pain.
- Pharmacokinetic changes in ageing (reduced renal clearance, increased body fat, decreased serum albumin) result in prolonged half-lives for opioids and NSAIDs — start low, go slow.
- Paracetamol (≤2 g/day in frail elderly or those <50 kg) remains first-line; avoid routine use of codeine due to unpredictable CYP2D6 metabolism and risk of constipation, falls, and respiratory depression.
- Opioid sensitivity increases with age: initial opioid doses should be reduced by 25–50% compared with younger adults, with extended titration intervals (e.g., oxycodone 2.5 mg every 6–8 hours).
- NSAIDs carry significantly higher risk in older adults (GI bleeding, acute kidney injury, cardiovascular events) and should be avoided or used at the lowest dose for the shortest duration possible.
- Polypharmacy is the norm in older patients — check for drug interactions before prescribing analgesics, particularly with anticoagulants, antihypertensives, SSRIs, and other sedating agents.
- Non-pharmacological strategies (ice, positioning, distraction, music therapy) are evidence-based adjuncts that should be offered to every older patient.
- Regular reassessment is critical: older people may develop delirium, falls, or respiratory depression from analgesics — use the RASS and 4AT to monitor for adverse effects.
- Opioid analgesics should be reviewed within 24–48 hours with an exit plan; long-term continuation requires documented indication, clear benefit, and safety monitoring.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander older adults may experience barriers to pain assessment and access to analgesics; culturally appropriate tools and multidisciplinary engagement are essential.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Acute pain in older adults (≥65 years) represents a significant clinical challenge in Australian healthcare. Pain is the most common reason for emergency department (ED) presentations in this age group, yet it remains consistently undertreated. The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) estimates that approximately 60–80% of residential aged care residents experience pain, with acute pain superimposed on chronic conditions in many cases.
Several factors contribute to the under-recognition and undertreatment of acute pain in older Australians:
- Age-related physiological changes alter pain perception, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics.
- Prevalence of cognitive impairment — approximately 30% of people aged ≥75 have some degree of dementia — limits the utility of standard verbal pain scales.
- Polypharmacy (defined as ≥5 regular medications) affects over 60% of Australians aged ≥75, creating complex drug interactions with analgesic agents.
- Atypical disease presentations mean that serious pathology may present without classic pain features.
- The ageing Australian population (projected 22% aged ≥65 by 2056) makes this an increasingly urgent public health issue.
This guideline provides a framework for the safe and effective management of acute pain in older people across Australian acute and primary care settings, with emphasis on atypical presentations, cognitive impairment, opioid sensitivity, and polypharmacy considerations.
Atypical Pain Presentations
Older adults frequently present with atypical pain syndromes that differ markedly from classical descriptions. Failure to recognise atypical presentations is a leading cause of delayed diagnosis and increased morbidity in Australian hospitals.
Common Atypical Patterns
| Condition | Classical Presentation | Atypical Presentation in Older Adults | Red Flags |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acute coronary syndrome | Central crushing chest pain radiating to left arm | Dyspnoea, fatigue, nausea, confusion, syncope, or epigastric discomfort | New confusion, unexplained hypotension, diaphoresis |
| Acute abdomen | Severe localised abdominal pain, guarding | Anorexia, restlessness, vague discomfort, malaise, mild distension | Absent or minimal abdominal signs despite serious pathology; raised lactate |
| Fracture (hip, vertebral) | Acute localised pain after fall or trauma | Refusal to weight-bear, new immobility, groin or knee pain, subtle postural change | New inability to stand; low-energy fracture mechanism |
| Herpes zoster | Dermatomal vesicular rash with burning pain | Prodromal pain preceding rash by 3–5 days; may be mistaken for musculoskeletal pain | Dermatomal distribution, skin hyperaesthesia |
| Urinary retention | Suprapubic pain, inability to void | Agitation, confusion, restlessness, behavioural disturbance without overt pain complaint | Palpable bladder; overflow incontinence |
| Mesenteric ischaemia | Severe periumbilical pain "out of proportion to examination" | Subtle abdominal discomfort, metabolic acidosis, bloating, diarrhoea | Atrial fibrillation, lactic acidosis, raised WCC |
Why Older People Under-Report Pain
- Generational stoicism: Many older Australians were raised to "soldier on" and may not volunteer information about pain.
- Fear of consequences: Concern that reporting pain will lead to hospital admission, loss of independence, or nursing home placement.
- Normalisation of pain: Belief that pain is an inevitable consequence of ageing that must be tolerated.
- Communication barriers: Hearing impairment, aphasia (post-stroke), English as a second language, or culturally different pain expression patterns.
- Cognitive impairment: Inability to recall, localise, or describe pain experiences.
- Health literacy: Limited understanding of analgesic options or how to describe symptoms effectively.
Pain Assessment in Cognitive Impairment
Approximately 50% of people living in Australian residential aged care facilities have dementia. Cognitive impairment does not abolish pain perception — the evidence confirms that people with dementia experience pain equally to those without. However, impaired communication makes assessment challenging and requires systematic approaches.
Tiered Assessment Approach
Validated Observational Pain Scales for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults
| Scale | Population | Domains Assessed | Score Range | Availability in Australia |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAINAD (Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia) | Severe dementia | Breathing, negative vocalisation, facial expression, body language, consolability | 0–10 | Widely used in RACFs; free to access |
| Abbey Pain Scale | Non-verbal older adults (dementia, post-stroke) | Vocalisation, facial expression, change in body language, behavioural change, physiological change, physical change | 0–24 (mild/moderate/severe) | Standard in Australian RACFs; endorsed by PainChek® |
| APPT (Abe Assessment of Pain in People with Impaired Cognition) | Various cognitive levels | Behavioural indicators during care activities | 0–10 | Used in some Australian geriatric services |
| PainChek® | Non-verbal / cognitively impaired | AI-assisted facial micro-expression analysis + 6 domains | 0–14 (no pain) to >14 (pain) | TGA-approved digital health tool; validated in Australian RACFs |
| FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) | Originally paediatric; adapted for non-verbal adults | Facial expression, leg movement, activity, cry, consolability | 0–10 | Available; used in acute care for non-verbal older adults |
Distinguishing Pain from Delirium
Pain and delirium frequently coexist and overlap in presentation. Use the 4AT (rapid assessment test for delirium) alongside a behavioural pain scale. Key distinguishing features:
| Feature | Pain | Delirium |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | May correlate with movement, position change, procedure | Acute, fluctuating; often worse at night (sundowning) |
| Attention | Generally preserved between painful episodes | Impaired; difficulty sustaining or shifting attention |
| Behaviour | Guarding, grimacing, withdrawal from stimulus | Agitation, pulling at lines, disorganised thinking |
| Response to analgesia | Improvement in behaviour with appropriate analgesia | No improvement or worsening with opioids (may worsen delirium) |
Opioid Sensitivity in Older Adults
Older adults demonstrate increased sensitivity to opioid analgesics due to age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes. This has profound implications for prescribing, dosing, monitoring, and safety.
Pharmacological Basis of Opioid Sensitivity
| Change | Effect on Opioid Pharmacology | Clinical Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Decreased renal function (GFR decline ~1 mL/min/year after age 40) | Accumulation of active metabolites (morphine-6-glucuronide, morphine-3-glucuronide, norpethidine) | Prolonged sedation, respiratory depression, myoclonus, neurotoxicity |
| Decreased hepatic mass and blood flow | Reduced Phase I metabolism (CYP-mediated oxidation) | Prolonged half-life of codeine, tramadol, oxycodone |
| Increased body fat : lean mass ratio | Increased volume of distribution for lipophilic opioids (fentanyl, methadone) | Prolonged duration of action; accumulation with repeated dosing |
| Decreased serum albumin | Increased free (unbound) drug fraction | Greater effect at equivalent total plasma concentrations |
| Increased CNS sensitivity (reduced opioid receptor reserve) | Enhanced pharmacodynamic response at lower concentrations | Greater analgesic effect AND greater adverse effect risk per dose |
| Decreased blood-brain barrier integrity | Increased CNS penetration of opioids | Enhanced sedation and respiratory depression |
Principles of Opioid Prescribing in Older Adults
Drug Cards — Preferred Opioids for Older Adults
Opioid Antagonist Considerations
Polypharmacy & Drug Interactions
Polypharmacy — defined as the concurrent use of ≥5 medications — affects over 60% of Australians aged ≥75 years and is the most significant risk factor for adverse drug events when initiating analgesic therapy. Older adults in residential aged care facilities average 9–10 regular medications. Every new prescription must be evaluated in the context of the existing medication burden.
Key Analgesic Drug Interactions in Older Adults
| Analgesic | Interacting Drug | Mechanism & Clinical Effect | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Opioids (all) | Benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, antipsychotics, antihistamines | Additive CNS depression → increased sedation, respiratory depression, falls, death | Reduce opioid dose; avoid concurrent benzodiazepine if possible; continuous SpO₂ monitoring |
| Opioids (all) | Anticholinergic medications (e.g., oxybutynin, amitriptyline, promethazine) | Additive constipation, urinary retention, confusion, delirium | Review anticholinergic burden (Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale); prescribe bowel regimen |
| NSAIDs | Anticoagulants (warfarin, DOACs), antiplatelets (aspirin, clopidogrel) | Increased GI bleeding risk (2–4× baseline); impaired platelet function | Avoid NSAIDs if on anticoagulants; if unavoidable, add PPI (e.g., pantoprazole 40 mg daily) |
| NSAIDs | ACE inhibitors, ARBs, diuretics ("triple whammy") | Acute kidney injury risk — up to 30% increased risk when all three combined | Avoid combination; if NSAID essential, monitor UECs at 48 hours and 1 week |
| NSAIDs | SSRIs (sertraline, escitalopram, citalopram) | Additive antiplatelet effect → GI bleeding risk increases ~6× vs. neither alone | Avoid concurrent use; use paracetamol + PPI instead |
| Paracetamol | Warfarin (high-dose paracetamol ≥2 g/day for >3 days) | May potentiate warfarin effect (INR ↑); mechanism uncertain | Monitor INR if paracetamol ≥2 g/day for >5 days; clinically significant only at ≥4 g/day |
| Gabapentin / Pregabalin | Opioids, benzodiazepines | Additive respiratory depression and sedation; FDA boxed warning (2019) | Reduce doses of both agents; monitor respiratory rate and sedation score |
| Tramadol (avoid) | SSRIs, SNRIs, MAOIs, lithium | Serotonin syndrome risk (agitation, hyperthermia, clonus, autonomic instability) | Avoid tramadol in older adults; use alternative opioid if needed |
Practical Polypharmacy Assessment
- Conduct a Home Medicines Review (HMR) — MBS Item 900 for community-dwelling older adults; Referral Medication Management Review (RMMR) — MBS Item 903 for RACF residents. These are funded through Medicare and conducted by accredited pharmacists.
- Use deprescribing tools: The STOPP/START criteria (v2) and the Australian Deprescribing Network guidelines provide evidence-based frameworks for identifying medications that can be ceased or reduced.
- Anticholinergic burden assessment: Use the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden (ACB) Scale. A total ACB score ≥3 is associated with increased falls, cognitive decline, and delirium risk.
- Renal function estimation: Always calculate eGFR (CKD-EPI equation) before prescribing renally cleared analgesics. Recheck UECs within 48–72 hours of initiating NSAIDs or high-dose opioids.
Pathophysiology of Pain in Ageing
Age-related changes in the nociceptive system alter both pain perception and the physiological response to acute pain. Understanding these changes is essential for safe prescribing.
Neuroanatomical Changes
- Peripheral nociceptors: Reduced density of C-fibre and Aδ-fibre nociceptors in skin, leading to elevated pain thresholds but potentially delayed recognition of tissue injury.
- Dorsal horn: Decreased inhibitory interneuron function and increased substance P release contribute to central sensitisation, paradoxically increasing pain intensity once nociceptive input is established.
- Descending modulation: Impaired endogenous opioid-mediated descending inhibitory pathways result in reduced capacity for pain self-modulation.
- Cortical processing: Age-related cortical thinning and white matter changes affect pain localisation and discrimination, contributing to vague or diffuse pain descriptions.
Pharmacokinetic Changes with Age
| Parameter | Age-Related Change | Implication for Analgesics |
|---|---|---|
| Absorption | ↓ Gastric pH, ↓ GI motility, ↓ splanchnic blood flow | Minimal clinically significant effect on most oral opioids; delayed onset may occur |
| Distribution | ↑ Body fat (↑ 20–30%), ↓ total body water, ↓ serum albumin | Lipophilic drugs (fentanyl, diazepam) have prolonged half-life; ↑ free fraction of protein-bound drugs |
| Metabolism | ↓ Hepatic mass (20–30%), ↓ hepatic blood flow (↓ 40%), ↓ Phase I reactions | Prolonged metabolism of CYP substrates; Phase II (glucuronidation) relatively preserved |
| Excretion | ↓ GFR (~1 mL/min/year), ↓ renal blood flow (↓ 10% per decade) | Accumulation of renally excreted metabolites (morphine-6-G, morphine-3-G); ↑ adverse effects |
Clinical Presentation & Diagnostic Criteria
There are no specific "diagnostic criteria" for acute pain — the diagnosis is clinical. However, in older adults, the presentation may be obscured by cognitive impairment, sensory deficits, or comorbid conditions. A systematic approach to pain assessment is essential.
Assessment Framework
Investigations
Investigations in acute pain serve two purposes: (1) identifying the underlying cause of pain, and (2) ensuring safe prescribing of analgesic agents. The following are recommended for all older adults presenting with acute pain.
Baseline Safety Investigations
Risk Stratification & Severity Assessment
Acute pain in older adults should be risk-stratified to guide the intensity of monitoring and the setting of care. The following framework integrates pain severity with patient-specific risk factors.
- Intact cognition (AMTS ≥8)
- No significant comorbidities
- Mild pain responsive to paracetamol
- No opioid requirement
- Low anticholinergic burden
- Mild cognitive impairment (AMTS 5–7)
- ≥5 regular medications
- Mild renal impairment (eGFR 30–60)
- Opioid required (low dose)
- Recent fall or fall risk
- Moderate–severe dementia (AMTS <5 or non-verbal)
- Significant renal impairment (eGFR <30)
- Opioid-dependent or high-dose opioid required
- ≥10 regular medications
- History of opioid-related adverse event
- Respiratory comorbidity (COPD, OSA)
Empirical Pain Management — Stepwise Approach
The WHO Analgesic Ladder, originally developed for cancer pain, has been adapted for acute pain in older adults with modification for age-related safety concerns. A two-step approach is preferred over the traditional three-step ladder.
Step 1: Non-Opioid Analgesia (All Patients)
Step 2: Adjunctive Non-Opioid Agents
Step 3: Opioid Analgesia (If Pain Uncontrolled)
Refer to the Opioid Sensitivity section above for detailed dosing. Key principles for initiating opioids in older adults:
- Use immediate-release formulations only for acute pain (avoid modified-release in opioid-naive patients).
- Start at 50% of the standard adult dose.
- Prescribe a bowel regimen simultaneously (e.g., docusate + senna, or movicol) to prevent opioid-induced constipation.
- Consider naloxone co-prescription for patients taking ≥50 mg morphine equivalent daily dose (strongly recommended for community prescribing).
- Review within 24–48 hours (hospital) or 7 days (community) with a documented plan for dose reduction or cessation.
Non-Pharmacological Strategies
Non-pharmacological interventions are evidence-based adjuncts that should be offered to every older patient with acute pain. They are particularly important in patients with cognitive impairment, where they may be the primary intervention.
- Cold therapy: Ice packs applied for 15–20 minutes every 2–3 hours for musculoskeletal injury (protect skin with barrier).
- Positioning and elevation: Correct positioning reduces postoperative, musculoskeletal, and wound pain.
- Distraction and music therapy: RCT evidence supports music therapy for reducing acute pain in cognitively impaired older adults.
- Heat therapy: Warm packs for chronic musculoskeletal pain flares (avoid in acute inflammation or impaired sensation).
- Gentle mobilisation: Early physiotherapy reduces pain and prevents deconditioning. Referral to physiotherapy (MBS Item 10960 — allied health chronic disease management plan, 5 sessions/year).
- Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS): Evidence supports use for musculoskeletal pain; low risk in older adults.
Directed / Mechanism-Specific Therapy
Specific acute pain syndromes in older adults benefit from targeted analgesic approaches based on the underlying mechanism of pain.
Acute Musculoskeletal Pain
- Paracetamol + short course of celecoxib (5–7 days) + ice/positioning.
- Consider topical NSAIDs (e.g., diclofenac gel) — minimal systemic absorption, evidence for knee and hand OA flares. PBS-listed for OA.
- Avoid sustained muscle relaxants (baclofen, tizanidine) — falls risk, additive sedation with opioids.
Acute Neuropathic Pain
- Gabapentin 100 mg nocte, titrate slowly, OR pregabalin 25 mg BD, titrate to 75–150 mg/day.
- Consider low-dose amitriptyline 10 mg nocte (caution: anticholinergic burden, falls, QTc prolongation — ECG before prescribing in patients with cardiac history).
- Herpes zoster: initiate antiviral (valaciclovir 1 g TDS for 7 days — PBS-listed) within 72 hours of rash onset; add gabapentinoid for acute zoster pain.
Acute Postoperative Pain in Older Adults
- Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard: paracetamol regular + regional anaesthesia (nerve block / epidural) + low-dose opioid PRN.
- Avoid PCA (patient-controlled analgesia) in cognitively impaired patients; use nurse-administered titrated opioids with sedation scoring.
- Regional anaesthesia (e.g., fascia iliaca compartment block for hip fracture) reduces opioid requirements and delirium incidence — request anaesthetic review early.
- Ketamine infusion (sub-anaesthetic dose: 0.1–0.25 mg/kg/hr) may be considered as an adjunct in complex pain cases — specialist guidance required.
Acute Visceral / Abdominal Pain
- Paracetamol + hyoscine butylbromide (Buscopan®) for smooth muscle spasm — PBS General Benefit.
- Low-dose opioid if paracetamol insufficient (morphine 2.5 mg SC or oxycodone 2.5 mg PO).
- Avoid NSAIDs — risk of GI perforation and renal impairment in the context of potential intra-abdominal pathology.
Monitoring
Older adults receiving analgesics require structured monitoring to detect efficacy, adverse effects, and complications. The frequency and intensity of monitoring should be proportional to the risk stratification outlined above.
Monitoring Parameters
| Parameter | Tool / Method | Frequency | Action Threshold |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain intensity | NRS, VDS, or observational scale (PAINAD/Abbey) | 30–60 min post-intervention (oral); 15–30 min (parenteral); every 4 hours (ongoing) | NRS ≥4 despite intervention → escalate therapy; NRS ≤3 → consider weaning |
| Sedation level | Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) or Pasero Opioid Sedation Scale | Every 1–2 hours after opioid initiation; every 4 hours ongoing | RASS ≤-2 or Pasero ≥3 (difficult to arouse) → HOLD opioid, consider naloxone |
| Respiratory rate | Manual count over 60 seconds (not machine-derived) | Every 1–2 hours post-opioid; every 4 hours ongoing | RR <8/min → hold opioid, reassess, consider naloxone |
| Oxygen saturation | Pulse oximetry | Continuous if parenteral opioids in hospital; intermittent if oral opioids | SpO₂ <92% (or <88% in known COPD) → assess respiratory drive, supplement O₂ |
| Delirium screening | 4AT or CAM (Confusion Assessment Method) | Baseline, 24 hours post-opioid initiation, and with any change in cognition | 4AT ≥4 → investigate for delirium cause (infection, pain, medication, constipation) |
| Bowel function | Bristol Stool Chart; frequency assessment | Daily while on opioids | No bowel motion for ≥3 days → escalate bowel regimen (consider macrogol, lactulose, or rectal intervention) |
| Falls risk | Clinical assessment; falls risk assessment tool (e.g., STRATIFY or FRAT) | With every medication change | New fall or near-fall → review analgesic regimen; increase supervision; consider dose reduction |
| Renal function | UEC / eGFR | 48–72 hours after initiating NSAIDs; weekly if on opioids with renal impairment | eGFR decline ≥25% or new AKI → cease nephrotoxic agents; nephrology review |
Opioid Exit Plan — Prescribing with an End in Sight
Special Populations
Frail Elderly (≥80 Years / Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5)
Renal Impairment
Hepatic Impairment
Immunocompromised Older Adults
Older People with Intellectual Disability
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience a disproportionate burden of pain-related conditions, yet face significant barriers to effective pain assessment and management. The AIHW reports that First Nations Australians are hospitalised for musculoskeletal conditions at 1.4 times the rate of non-Indigenous Australians and have higher rates of injury, renal disease, and diabetes — all sources of acute pain.
Culturally safe pain management requires recognition of the following considerations:
📚 References
- 1. Schofield P. The assessment of pain in older adults: an update on the evidence. British Journal of Pain. 2022;16(1):34–42.
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Older Australians. AIHW, Canberra; 2023.
- 3. Aubrun F, Nouette-Gaulain K, Ferretti M, et al. Revision of expert panel's guidelines on postoperative pain management. Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain Medicine. 2019;38(4):387–397.
- 4. American Geriatrics Society (AGS) Panel on Pharmacological Management of Persistent Pain in Older Persons. Pharmacological management of persistent pain in older persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57(8):1331–1346.
- 5. O'Hanlon S, Tham T, Morphet J. Pain assessment in older people in the emergency department: a review of the literature. Australasian Emergency Nursing Journal. 2020;23(2):94–102.
- 6. Abbey J, Piller N, De Bellis A, et al. The Abbey pain scale: a 1-minute numerical indicator for people with end-stage dementia. International Journal of Palliative Nursing. 2004;10(1):6–13.
- 7. Ersek M, Herr K, Engel J, et al. PAINAD — Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia scale. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2019;20(8):1027–1033.
- 8. PainChek Ltd. Clinical validation studies and TGA registration. Available at: www.painchek.com. Accessed 2024.
- 9. O'Mahony D, O'Sullivan D, Byrne S, et al. STOPP/START criteria for potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people: version 2. Age and Ageing. 2015;44(2):213–218.
- 10. Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Internal Medicine. 2015;175(5):827–834.
- 11. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). Australian Atlas of Healthcare Variation. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2023.
- 12. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Prescribing Drugs of Dependence in General Practice: Part B — Benzodiazepines. Melbourne: RACGP; 2015 (updated 2020).
- 13. Lavan AH, Gallagher P, Parsons C, O'Mahony D. STOPPFrail (Screening Tool of Older Persons Prescriptions in Frail adults with limited life expectancy): consensus validation. Age and Ageing. 2017;46(4):600–607.
- 14. Dijkstra JB, Houx PJ, Jolles J. Cognition after major surgery in the elderly: test performance and complaints. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 1999;82(6):867–874.
- 15. Loh HH, Tan CH. Pharmacological approach to pain in the elderly. Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology. 2018;31(1):1–7.
- 16. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). The Health and Welfare of Australia's Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples. AIHW, Canberra; 2023.
- 17. Liddle J, Lovarini M. Opioid prescribing and the role of opioid stewardship in residential aged care. Australian Journal of General Practice. 2022;51(9):654–658.
- 18. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics Group, Therapeutic Guidelines. eTG complete: Analgesic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2024.
- 19. NPS MedicineWise. Medicines Safety Update: Opioids and Older Australians. Sydney: NPS MedicineWise; 2022.
- 20. Lochhead R, Hipwell D, Stott D. Pain assessment in dementia: the role of behavioural observation tools. International Journal of Older People Nursing. 2021;16(3):e12374.