📋 Key Information Summary
- Constipation is near-universal in palliative care — caused by opioids, immobility, reduced oral intake, dehydration, hypercalcaemia, and autonomic dysfunction from advanced disease.
- Prevention is paramount: all patients starting opioids must receive a co-prescribed stimulant laxative (e.g. senna ± docusate) from day one; failure to do so constitutes a clinical safety gap.
- Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is mediated by µ-receptor agonism in the myenteric and submucosal plexuses; tolerance does not develop, so laxatives are required for the duration of opioid use.
- Assess before treating: perform a digital rectal examination (DRE) and abdominal examination to exclude faecal impaction and bowel obstruction before escalating laxatives.
- First-line laxatives for OIC: senna 15–30 mg nocte + docusate sodium 100 mg BD (stimulant + softener); titrate to effect. Movicol® (macrogol) is preferred second-line or for hard stool.
- Refractory OIC: consider methylnaltrexone (Relistor®) 8–12 mg SC alternate days — a peripherally-acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist (PAMORA) that does not cross the blood-brain barrier and does not reverse analgesia.
- Faecal impaction presents with paradoxical diarrhoea, overflow, urinary retention, or delirium; managed with oral macrogol or phosphate/enema preparations, followed by manual evacuation if refractory.
- Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is common in advanced ovarian, colorectal, and gastric cancers; management is primarily medical (anti-emetics, antisecretory agents, corticosteroids) with surgery reserved for selected patients.
- Stomas in palliative care may be fashioned for symptom relief (faecal diversion in MBO) or pre-existing stomas require ongoing care; involve a stomal therapy nurse early.
- Bowel protocols should be individualised, documented, and reviewed at least weekly; a structured bowel chart (frequency, consistency, straining, flatus) guides titration.
- Special populations: elderly patients are more susceptible to impaction; patients with renal impairment need dose adjustments for magnesium- and phosphate-containing laxatives; pregnant patients require osmotic rather than stimulant laxatives where possible.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples may face barriers including remote location, limited access to stomal therapy services, cultural sensitivities around rectal examination, and higher rates of gastrointestinal malignancy; culturally safe care is essential.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Constipation is one of the most prevalent and distressing symptoms in palliative care, affecting between 40% and 90% of patients depending on the underlying diagnosis and treatment received. It significantly impairs quality of life, causing abdominal pain, nausea, anorexia, confusion, and urinary retention. In the Australian palliative care setting, constipation is frequently multifactorial — arising from opioid analgesia, reduced mobility, diminished oral intake, dehydration, autonomic neuropathy, metabolic derangements (notably hypercalcaemia), and direct tumour effects on the bowel.
The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reports that over 160,000 Australians receive palliative care services annually, with the majority managed in the community by general practitioners and specialist palliative care teams. Despite the high prevalence of constipation, studies consistently demonstrate under-recognition and under-treatment. The Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) data indicate that bowel symptoms are among the top five reported problems at initial palliative care assessment.
Prevention and proactive management of constipation are core components of quality palliative care and are mandated under the National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-quality End-of-life Care (ACSQHC, 2015). A systematic approach — incorporating regular bowel assessment, prophylactic laxatives with opioid initiation, and escalation pathways for refractory symptoms — is essential.
This article provides a comprehensive Australian clinical guideline covering opioid-induced constipation, faecal impaction, bowel obstruction (including malignant bowel obstruction), and stoma considerations in the palliative care context.
Opioid-Induced Constipation
Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is the most common cause of constipation in palliative care. Unlike other opioid side effects (nausea, sedation), tolerance does not develop to OIC — it persists for the entire duration of opioid therapy. OIC occurs with all opioids (morphine, oxycodone, hydromorphone, fentanyl, methadone, buprenorphine) and all routes (oral, transdermal, subcutaneous, intrathecal).
Pathophysiology
Opioids bind to µ-opioid receptors in the myenteric (Auerbach's) and submucosal (Meissner's) plexuses of the gastrointestinal tract. This results in:
- Decreased propulsive peristaltic contractions
- Increased non-propulsive (segmental) contractions — causing spasm and prolonged transit time
- Increased fluid absorption from the gut lumen — harder, drier stools
- Decreased secretion of intestinal fluid and electrolytes
- Increased anal sphincter tone — reducing the urge to defecate
The consequence is delayed colonic transit, stool desiccation, and difficulty with evacuation. These effects are dose-dependent but can occur even at low opioid doses in susceptible individuals.
Assessment of OIC
A structured bowel assessment should be performed at every palliative care review and documented in the clinical record. Key elements include:
- Last bowel action (date, time)
- Stool consistency — use the Bristol Stool Chart (Types 1–2 = constipated; Type 3–4 = ideal)
- Straining or digital evacuation required
- Passage of flatus (absence suggests obstruction)
- Abdominal symptoms — distension, pain, nausea, vomiting
- Current opioid type, dose, and route
- Current laxative regimen and adherence
- Other contributing medications — anticholinergics, calcium channel blockers, ondansetron, 5-HT₃ antagonists, vincristine
- Oral intake and hydration status
- Mobility level
Pharmacological Management of OIC
Laxative therapy for OIC follows a stepwise approach. Australian palliative care guidelines (Palliative Care Therapeutic Guidelines, Palliative Care Australia) recommend the following ladder:
Laxative Drug Cards
Faecal Impaction
Faecal impaction occurs when a hard, immovable mass of stool accumulates in the rectum or sigmoid colon. It is a common complication in palliative care patients, particularly those who are immobile, cognitively impaired, dehydrated, or receiving inadequate laxative prophylaxis. Impaction can cause significant morbidity including:
- Paradoxical (overflow) diarrhoea — liquid stool leaking around the impacted mass
- Urinary retention and recurrent urinary tract infections
- Faecal ulceration and rectal bleeding
- Nausea, vomiting, and anorexia
- Delirium — particularly in elderly patients
- Stercoral perforation — a rare but life-threatening complication
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is clinical, supported by:
- Digital rectal examination (DRE): the most important initial investigation — reveals hard faecal mass in the rectal vault. Perform gently to avoid mucosal trauma.
- Abdominal examination: palpable faecal mass in the left iliac fossa or sigmoid colon; distension; reduced bowel sounds.
- Abdominal X-ray (AXR): if clinical assessment is inconclusive or to assess proximal faecal loading. Useful for differentiating impaction from obstruction.
- Note: CT abdomen should be reserved for suspected complications (perforation, obstruction) — not routinely indicated for impaction alone.
Management of Faecal Impaction
Management follows a stepwise approach:
Bowel Obstruction
Bowel obstruction in palliative care may be mechanical (tumour, adhesions, hernia) or functional (paralytic ileus). Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is the most common cause in patients with advanced cancer, particularly ovarian, colorectal, gastric, and pancreatic malignancies. MBO occurs in approximately 3–15% of patients with advanced cancer and up to 50% of patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Clinical Presentation
| Feature | Small Bowel Obstruction | Large Bowel Obstruction |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Acute | Often gradual |
| Pain | Colicky, central/periumbilical | Colicky, lower abdomen |
| Vomiting | Early, may be bile-stained or faeculent | Late (if at all) |
| Distension | May be minimal initially | Prominent |
| Flatus/faeces | Absence of flatus and bowel actions | May still pass flatus initially; absolute constipation later |
| Bowel sounds | High-pitched, tinkling | Reduced or absent |
Investigations
Medical Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction
In patients with advanced cancer and MBO who are not surgical candidates (the majority in palliative care), medical management is the mainstay of treatment. The goal is symptom relief: control of pain, nausea, vomiting, and secretions.
Surgical Considerations
Surgical intervention (bypass, stenting, resection, or stoma formation) in MBO should be considered only in carefully selected patients with:
- Good performance status (ECOG 0–1)
- Single-level obstruction
- Slowly progressive disease (long interval since primary treatment)
- Absence of diffuse peritoneal carcinomatosis
- Expected survival >2–3 months
Self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) for colonic obstruction (via interventional endoscopy or radiology) can be a bridge to surgery or a definitive palliative measure. MBS Item 30474 covers colonic stenting. Access is available at major metropolitan hospitals and some regional centres in Australia.
Stoma Considerations
Stomas — ileostomy or colostomy — may be present as a result of previous surgery or may be fashioned in the palliative setting to relieve bowel obstruction or divert faecal flow. In palliative care, stoma creation is most commonly performed for:
- Unresectable distal colonic or rectal obstruction (end colostomy / loop colostomy)
- Complex pelvic malignancy causing intractable obstruction or fistulation
- Incontinence management in advanced neurological disease (rare)
- Pre-existing stomas from prior oncological surgery requiring ongoing management
Pre-Operative Counselling
Patients and families must receive thorough pre-operative counselling, ideally involving a stomal therapy nurse (STN). Key discussion points include:
- Type of stoma and expected output (ileostomy: liquid/pasty, high volume; colostomy: formed stool, lower volume)
- Appliance selection and fitting
- Skin care and peristomal dermatitis prevention
- Odour management and dietary adjustments
- Impact on body image and psychosocial wellbeing
- Expected prognosis and whether the stoma is likely to be permanent
Ongoing Stoma Care in Palliative Patients
| Issue | Management |
|---|---|
| High-output stoma (>1.5 L/day) | Reduce oral fluids that exacerbate output; consider loperamide 2–4 mg PO before meals; consider codeine phosphate 30 mg PO TDS; ensure adequate fluid and electrolyte replacement; consider octreotide if refractory. |
| Peristomal skin irritation | Ensure correct appliance sizing; use barrier cream/spray (e.g. Cavilon™); treat candidal infection with topical antifungal; referral to STN. |
| Stomal retraction or prolapse | Convex appliance for retraction; surgical review for significant prolapse if causing symptoms; STN assessment. |
| Parastomal hernia | Support belt; appliance modification; conservative management preferred in palliative setting unless causing obstruction. |
| Constipation (colostomy) | Same laxative principles as constipated patients without stomas; senna + docusate or macrogol. Avoid phosphate enemas via stoma. |
Pharmacological Considerations for Stoma Patients
- Modified-release medications: avoid in ileostomy patients — incomplete absorption and risk of obstruction from matrix tablets. Use immediate-release formulations.
- Opioid patches: transdermal fentanyl and buprenorphine patches are appropriate if oral absorption is unreliable.
- Oral morphine liquid: absorbed in the stomach and proximal small bowel — reliable in ileostomy and colostomy patients.
- Loperamide: useful for high-output ileostomy (2–4 mg PO before meals); contraindicated in complete obstruction.
Monitoring
Regular monitoring of bowel function is essential in all palliative care patients. A structured approach ensures early detection of complications and guides laxative titration.
Bowel Chart
A bowel chart should be maintained for all inpatients and recommended for community patients receiving opioid therapy. Document:
- Date and time of each bowel action
- Stool consistency (Bristol Stool Chart type)
- Volume (small / moderate / large)
- Colour — note any blood, melaena, or bile-staining
- Straining (yes/no)
- Passage of flatus (yes/no)
- Laxatives administered and response
- Abdominal symptoms (pain, distension, nausea)
Review Schedule
Red Flags Requiring Urgent Assessment
- Absolute constipation (no bowel action >5 days) with abdominal distension and vomiting — suspect bowel obstruction
- Sudden onset of severe abdominal pain — suspect perforation or ischaemia
- Melaena or significant rectal bleeding — upper GI source or rectal ulceration from impaction
- New-onset confusion or delirium in an elderly patient — consider faecal impaction as a reversible cause
- Signs of peritonism (guarding, rigidity, rebound) — emergency surgical assessment required
Special Populations
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience a disproportionate burden of cancer, chronic kidney disease, and other conditions requiring palliative care. Gastrointestinal cancers (colorectal, oesophageal, gastric, liver) are among the most commonly diagnosed malignancies. Despite this, access to palliative care services — particularly in remote and very remote communities — remains significantly lower than for non-Indigenous Australians.
📚 References
- 1. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Strategy 2018. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2018.
- 2. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care (ACSQHC). National Consensus Statement: Essential Elements for Safe and High-quality End-of-life Care. Sydney: ACSQHC; 2015.
- 3. Larkin PJ, Cherny NI, La Carpia D, et al. Diagnosis, assessment and management of constipation in advanced cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv111–iv125.
- 4. Candy B, Jones L, Goodman ML, et al. Laxatives or methylnaltrexone for the management of constipation in palliative care patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(1):CD003448.
- 5. Thomas J, Karver S, Cooney GA, et al. Methylnaltrexone for opioid-induced constipation in advanced illness. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(22):2332–2343.
- 6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Palliative care services in Australia. Cat. no. HWV 79. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
- 7. Feuer DJ, Broadley KE. Systematic review and meta-analysis of corticosteroids for the resolution of malignant bowel obstruction in advanced gynaecological and gastrointestinal cancers. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(5):535–541.
- 8. Mercadante S, Ferrera P, Villari P, et al. Aggressive pharmacological treatment for reversing malignant bowel obstruction. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004;28(4):412–416.
- 9. Australian Association of Stomal Therapy Nurses (AASTN). Standards of Care: Colostomy, Ileostomy and Urostomy. 4th ed. Melbourne: AASTN; 2018.
- 10. Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC). National Outcomes and Casemix Report. Wollongong: University of Wollongong; 2023.
- 11. Australian Government Department of Health. National Agreement on Closing the Gap. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2020.
- 12. Abernethy AP, Currow DC, Frith P, et al. Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial of sustained release morphine for the management of refractory dyspnoea. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):523–528.