📋 Key Information Summary
- The chosen drug route should be effective and least burdensome for the patient; always start with the least invasive option compatible with clinical goals.
- Oral administration remains the preferred route in palliative care until swallowing difficulties, nausea/vomiting, poor absorption, or inadequate symptom control necessitate a change.
- Sublingual and buccal routes bypass first-pass hepatic metabolism and are useful when oral swallowing is impaired but the patient retains mucosal integrity.
- Enteral tubes (nasogastric, PEG/PEJ) allow continued enteral drug delivery; however, not all oral formulations are suitable for crushed or liquid administration through tubes.
- Transdermal patches provide steady-state drug delivery over 24–72 hours, are ideal for patients unable to swallow, and avoid repeated needle-sticks — but onset is slow (12–24 h for fentanyl patches).
- Transdermal patches must not be cut (unless specifically designed for it), must be applied to intact, non-irradiated skin, and are affected by fever and high ambient temperatures.
- The subcutaneous (SC) route is the workhorse parenteral route in Australian palliative care; butterfly needles and syringe drivers (e.g., Graseby™, McKinley™) enable continuous SC infusions.
- SC infusions allow reliable delivery of multiple medications simultaneously (e.g., morphine + midazolam + hyoscine butylbromide) and are preferred over IV in community palliative settings.
- When switching routes, use published equianalgesic conversion ratios and reduce the calculated dose by 25–50% to account for incomplete cross-tolerance.
- Regular medication review is essential in palliative care — medications should be rationalised as the patient's condition changes; polypharmacy is a significant source of burden.
- Special considerations apply in renal impairment (avoid morphine metabolites; prefer fentanyl or hydromorphone), hepatic impairment (reduce doses, avoid hepatotoxic agents), and paediatric palliative care (weight-based dosing, limited transdermal options).
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients in remote communities may face barriers including limited pharmacy access, language differences, and cultural considerations around end-of-life medications; involve Indigenous health workers early.
Introduction & Australian Context
Selecting the appropriate route of drug administration is a fundamental clinical decision in palliative care. The overarching principle is to choose the route that is effective, least burdensome, and aligned with the patient's goals of care. As disease progresses, the ability to take medications orally may be lost, necessitating timely transition to alternative routes to maintain symptom control and comfort.
In Australia, palliative care is delivered across diverse settings — inpatient palliative care units, general hospital wards, residential aged care facilities, and the community (including remote and very remote areas). The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) reports that approximately 70% of Australians express a preference to die at home, yet the majority of deaths still occur in hospital. Reliable drug delivery across all settings is essential to support place-of-care preferences.
This topic covers the principal routes of drug administration used in Australian palliative medicine:
- Oral route — including sublingual and buccal absorption
- Enteral tube route — nasogastric (NG), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (PEJ)
- Transdermal route — medicated patches and topical preparations
- Subcutaneous route — intermittent injection and continuous infusion via syringe drivers
Other routes (rectal, intranasal, intrathecal, epidural) are used in select circumstances but are beyond the scope of this article. Intravenous administration is uncommon in community palliative care in Australia and is generally reserved for acute hospital settings.
Oral Route
The oral route is the default and preferred route of drug administration in palliative care. It is non-invasive, familiar to patients, self-administered (promoting autonomy), and has the broadest range of available formulations. Oral administration should be maintained for as long as the patient can safely and effectively swallow and absorb medications.
When Oral Is Appropriate
- Patient can swallow tablets, capsules, or liquids safely
- No significant nausea or vomiting that would impair absorption
- Functional gastrointestinal tract with adequate absorption
- Sufficient time to onset (not needed urgently — otherwise consider SC)
- Patient preference supports oral administration
Oral Formulation Options
| Formulation | Advantages | Disadvantages | Palliative Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tablets (standard) | Stable, accurate dosing, wide availability | May be difficult to swallow; some cannot be crushed | Morphine SR tablets, paracetamol, dexamethasone |
| Orodispersible / Wafer | Dissolves on tongue; no water needed | Limited range; may be unpalatable | Ondansetron ODT (Ondemet®), lorazepam sublingual |
| Liquids / Solutions | Flexible dosing, easy to swallow, can be given via syringe | Taste, bulk, some require refrigeration | Morphine IR solution (Ordine®), dexamethasone elixir |
| Sublingual tablets | Rapid onset, bypasses first-pass metabolism | Limited drug range; requires mucosal integrity | Fentanyl SL (Abstral®), buprenorphine SL (Temgesic®) |
| Buccal films | Applied to inner cheek; steady absorption | Unfamiliar technique; mucosal irritation | Fentanyl buccal (Onsolis® — not PBS-listed) |
| Capsules (can sprinkle) | Contents can often be sprinkled on soft food | Not all capsules can be opened; taste | Dexamethasone capsules (opened), some antiemetics |
Sublingual and Buccal Absorption
The sublingual mucosa is highly vascularised, allowing rapid drug absorption directly into the systemic circulation via the sublingual veins, bypassing the portal system and first-pass hepatic metabolism. This is particularly valuable for:
- Breakthrough cancer pain: Fentanyl sublingual tablets (Abstral®) or intranasal fentanyl provide rapid onset (5–15 minutes) for episodic pain
- Nausea when swallowing is impaired: Ondansetron orodispersible wafers dissolve on the tongue
- Anxiety and agitation: Lorazepam (Ativan®) can be administered sublingually; onset within 15–20 minutes
- End-of-life symptom management: Sublingual midazolam for terminal restlessness when SC access is not available or not desired
When to Transition Away from Oral
Indications to change from the oral route include:
- Dysphagia (oropharyngeal or oesophageal) — assessed clinically or by speech pathology
- Persistent nausea and vomiting not controlled by antiemetics
- Mucositis (grade 3–4) preventing comfortable oral intake
- Reduced consciousness or coma
- Bowel obstruction with intractable vomiting
- Patient declining oral medications
- Need for more rapid onset or reliable absorption than oral can provide
Key Oral Medications in Palliative Care
Enteral Tubes
Enteral tube administration allows continued drug delivery through the gastrointestinal tract when oral swallowing is no longer possible or safe. In palliative care, enteral tubes are used selectively — the decision to place a tube must be guided by the patient's goals, prognosis, and the potential for reversibility of the swallowing impairment.
Types of Enteral Access
| Tube Type | Insertion | Duration | Palliative Indication |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasogastric (NG) | Bedside, nasally placed | Short-to-medium term (4–6 weeks) | Acute reversible dysphagia (e.g., post-radiotherapy mucositis, stroke recovery); rarely placed in last days of life |
| Nasoenteric (NJ) | Endoscopic or radiological; tip in jejunum | Short-to-medium term | Gastric outlet obstruction; gastroparesis; when gastric drug absorption is unreliable |
| PEG (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy) | Endoscopic procedure (usually requires sedation) | Long term (months–years) | Considered only if prognosis >1–2 months and meaningful benefit; head/neck cancer with anticipated prolonged dysphagia |
| PEJ (Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy) | Endoscopic; tube enters jejunum | Long term | When gastric administration is contraindicated (e.g., gastroparesis, gastric surgery) |
Principles of Drug Administration via Enteral Tubes
- Prefer liquid formulations where available — they require no preparation, are less likely to block the tube, and allow accurate dosing
- If tablets must be crushed, check compatibility first — do NOT crush enteric-coated, sustained-release, or cytotoxic medications
- Flush the tube with 15–30 mL of water before and after each medication to prevent blockage
- Do not mix different medications together in the same syringe — drug interactions may cause precipitation
- For jejunal tubes, only administer drugs that can be absorbed in the small bowel; proton pump inhibitors require gastric acid for absorption and may be ineffective via NJ/PEJ
- Confirm tube position (aspirate pH <5.5 for gastric tubes; X-ray for initial NG placement) before administration
Drugs to Avoid via Enteral Tubes
| Drug / Class | Reason | Alternative |
|---|---|---|
| Modified-release morphine (e.g., MS Contin®, Kapanol®) | Crushing destroys slow-release mechanism → dose dumping → respiratory depression | Use immediate-release morphine solution (Ordine®) via tube |
| Enteric-coated aspirin, mycophenolate | Coating designed to protect from gastric acid; destroying it may cause gastric irritation or altered absorption | Use plain formulations; IV mycophenolate (if available) |
| Sublingual buprenorphine (Temgesic®) | Designed for sublingual absorption; very low oral bioavailability via GI tract | Transdermal buprenorphine (Norspan®) or alternative opioid |
| Cytotoxic agents | Crushing creates hazardous powder; risk of exposure to carers | Consult oncology; alternative routes or formulations |
| Proton pump inhibitors (via NJ/PEJ) | Require gastric acid for activation; ineffective if bypassing stomach | IV pantoprazole or H₂-receptor antagonist (famotidine) |
Ethical Considerations
In Australian palliative care, the decision to place an enteral tube should involve a goals-of-care discussion with the patient (if capable), family, and the multidisciplinary team. Tube placement for hydration or nutrition in the last weeks of life is generally considered non-beneficial and may prolong dying. Palliative Care Australia and the Australian & New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine (ANZSPM) support the position that artificial nutrition is not obligatory in end-of-life care, and that comfort-focused oral care is more appropriate.
Transdermal Route
The transdermal route delivers medication across the skin into systemic circulation, providing a non-invasive, needle-free alternative that is particularly valuable in palliative care. It is ideal for patients who cannot swallow, have intractable nausea, or wish to avoid repeated injections. Transdermal delivery produces stable plasma drug concentrations, reducing peaks and troughs associated with intermittent dosing.
Available Transdermal Agents in Australian Palliative Care
Practical Considerations for Transdermal Patches
Topical Agents (Non-Patch)
Several topical formulations are used adjunctively in palliative care for local symptom relief:
- Lidocaine 5% medicated plasters (Versatis®) — for localised neuropathic pain; apply to affected area for 12 hours on / 12 hours off
- Diclofenac gel (Voltaren Emulgel®) — for musculoskeletal pain; PBS General Benefit
- Ketamine cream (compounded) — for neuropathic pain; not PBS-listed; use under specialist guidance
- Glycopyrrolate (glycopyrronium) sublingual spray — for sialorrhoea; compounded formulation available through some Australian pharmacies
Subcutaneous Route
The subcutaneous (SC) route is the most commonly used parenteral route in Australian palliative care, both in hospital and community settings. SC administration avoids the complexity and infection risk of intravenous access and can be managed by community palliative care nurses, residential aged care staff, and in many cases by trained family carers.
Methods of SC Administration
| Method | Description | Indication |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent SC injection | Bolus injection via a 25–27G needle or butterfly needle into anterior thigh, abdomen, or upper arm | Single-dose breakthrough medications (e.g., morphine PRN); less frequent dosing requirements |
| Continuous SC infusion (syringe driver) | Programmable pump delivers a set volume over 24 hours via a subcutaneous butterfly needle | Continuous symptom control; multiple medications needed; unstable oral absorption; end-of-life care |
| Rapid SC bolus (SCI / SSCI) | Subcutaneous injection given as a rapid push when continuous infusion is impractical or for acute symptom crises | Acute breakthrough symptoms when syringe driver is not immediately available |
Syringe Drivers in Australian Palliative Care
Syringe drivers (also called syringe pumps or continuous subcutaneous infusions) are an essential tool in Australian palliative medicine. Commonly used devices include:
- Graseby™ MS16A / MS26 — widely used in Australian palliative care; lightweight, battery-operated
- McKinley™ T34 — programmable; increasingly available in Australian hospitals and community services
- CME Bodyguard™ — used in some settings; versatile
Syringe drivers typically run over a 24-hour cycle with total volumes of 1–60 mL/24 h depending on the device. The subcutaneous site is usually the anterior abdominal wall or the anterior thigh; the butterfly needle (e.g., BD Saf-T-Intima™ or similar) is replaced every 3–7 days or earlier if signs of site infection, inflammation, or leaking occur.
Common Syringe Driver Combinations
| Symptom | Drug | Starting SC Dose (24 h) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pain | Morphine | SC dose = ½ to ⅓ of previous 24-h oral dose (50% reduction for incomplete cross-tolerance) | Avoid in eGFR <30 — use fentanyl |
| Pain (renal impairment) | Fentanyl | Approximately ⅓ of the equianalgesic morphine SC dose | No active metabolites; preferred in renal failure |
| Nausea / Vomiting | Haloperidol | 0.5–2 mg SC/24 h | First-line antiemetic via SC route; compatible in syringe driver |
| Nausea (dizziness-related) | Cyclizine | 75–150 mg SC/24 h | May cause local site reactions; less commonly used SC than haloperidol |
| Secretions (death rattle) | Hyoscine butylbromide | 40–80 mg SC/24 h (or 20 mg SC stat then 40–60 mg/24 h) | First-line; does NOT cross BBB (no sedation or confusion) |
| Secretions (alternatives) | Glycopyrronium (glycopyrrolate) | 0.2–0.6 mg SC/24 h (or 0.2 mg SC stat) | Does not cross BBB; compatible with most syringe driver drugs |
| Agitation / Restlessness | Midazolam | 10–30 mg SC/24 h (or 2.5–5 mg SC stat, repeatable) | First-line benzodiazepine for terminal agitation; compatible with morphine in syringe driver |
| Nausea (gastric stasis) | Metoclopramide | 30–60 mg SC/24 h | Prokinetic + antiemetic; max 0.5 mg/kg/day to avoid extrapyramidal effects |
Conversion Ratios: Oral to Subcutaneous
| Drug | Oral : SC Ratio | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Morphine | 2:1 to 3:1 (oral:SC) | Oral morphine 60 mg/24 h → SC morphine 20–30 mg/24 h (reduce by 50% for incomplete cross-tolerance on first switch) |
| Hydromorphone | 2:1 to 3:1 (oral:SC) | Oral hydromorphone 8 mg/24 h → SC hydromorphone 3–4 mg/24 h |
| Oxycodone | 2:1 (oral:SC) approximated via morphine equivalency | Convert oxycodone to oral morphine equivalent first, then to SC morphine |
| Fentanyl | Patch to SC: variable — use conversion tables | Fentanyl 25 μg/h patch ≈ SC fentanyl 25 μg/h; a 72-h patch dose divided by 72 gives approximate hourly SC rate |
SC Site Management
- Rotate sites every 3–7 days, or sooner if redness, swelling, pain, or leakage develops
- Preferred sites: anterior abdominal wall (below the costal margin, lateral to the umbilicus), anterior thigh, upper arm
- Avoid oedematous areas, areas of lymphoedema, skin lesions, and sites of previous radiation
- Use aseptic technique for insertion; secure the needle with a transparent dressing to allow site monitoring
- Document site, date of insertion, and drugs running at each change
Patient and Carer Education
For patients receiving SC infusions at home, community palliative care services provide education to family carers regarding:
- Recognising signs of site complications (redness, swelling, pain, leaking)
- Understanding alarm signals on the syringe driver
- When to contact the palliative care service or after-hours triage line
- Safe storage of medications and disposal of sharps (sharps containers provided free in most Australian states and territories)
Special Populations
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians experience a disproportionate burden of advanced and life-limiting illness, yet access to culturally safe palliative care remains inequitable. The AIHW reports that Indigenous Australians are less likely to receive specialist palliative care and more likely to die in hospital rather than at home or on country. Effective drug route selection and management must account for the unique circumstances faced by Indigenous patients, particularly those in remote and very remote communities.
📚 References
- 1. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Standards. 5th ed. Canberra: Palliative Care Australia; 2018.
- 2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Palliative care services in Australia. Cat. no. HWU 214. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
- 3. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Care of patients with advanced chronic conditions: A guide for general practice. Melbourne: RACGP; 2020.
- 4. Currow DC, Agar MR, To THM, et al. Prescribing in palliative care as death approaches. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020;59(1):143–152.
- 5. Australian & New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine (ANZSPM). Position statement on artificial nutrition and hydration in palliative care. Sydney: ANZSPM; 2019.
- 6. Fallon M, Giusti R, Aielli F, et al. Management of cancer pain in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Suppl 4):iv166–iv191.
- 7. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Decision-making for the provision of futile or non-beneficial treatment to adults: A guide for clinicians. Canberra: NHMRC; 2020.
- 8. Hägerbäumer E, Müller-Mundt G, Engeser P, et al. Drugs and dosage forms for use in palliative care via syringe drivers: A systematic review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;62(2):375–388.
- 9. Australian Medicines Handbook (AMH). Australian Medicines Handbook. Adelaide: AMH Pty Ltd; 2024.
- 10. Department of Health and Aged Care. Schedule of Pharmaceutical Benefits. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2024. Available at: pbs.gov.au.
- 11. Palliative Care Therapeutic Guidelines Writing Group. Palliative Care: Therapeutic Guidelines. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2023.
- 12. Davis MP, Bruera E. Interventional pain management in palliative care. In: Walsh D, Caraceni AT, Fainsinger R, et al., eds. Palliative Medicine. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2009:363–372.
- 13. Australian Indigenous Doctors' Association (AIDA). Position statement on end-of-life care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians. Canberra: AIDA; 2020.
- 14. Shahid S, Finn L, Thompson SC. Barriers to participation of Aboriginal people in cancer care: communication in the hospital setting. Med J Aust. 2009;190(10):574–579.
- 15. Royal Australian College of Physicians (RACP). Chronic kidney disease management in primary care. 4th ed. Sydney: RACP; 2020.