๐ Key Information Summary
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a default treatment in Australia unless a valid Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) or Not-for-Resuscitation (NFR) order is documented โ proactively address resuscitation status in all patients with life-limiting illness.
- CPR in actively dying or end-stage organ failure patients is almost never successful and causes rib fractures, visceral injury, and distressing last memories for families.
- A resuscitation decision is a medical determination, not a patient right to demand โ clinicians are not obligated to offer or provide futile treatment.
- Use structured advance care planning (ACP) frameworks: discuss goals of care, ceiling of treatment, and escalation preferences well before an acute deterioration.
- Document resuscitation status using state/territory-recognised forms (e.g., Resuscitation Plan in NSW, Goals of Care in Queensland, DNR form in Victoria) and ensure they are accessible in clinical systems and at the bedside.
- The Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) process is being adopted across Australian jurisdictions as a person-centred emergency care plan.
- Valid DNR/NFR orders must be clearly communicated to ambulance services โ without a documented plan, paramedics are legally and professionally obliged to commence CPR.
- Ambulance and emergency plans (e.g., Ambulance Victoria's Treat-Refer-Transfer framework, NSW Health's Acute Resuscitation Plan) should specify comfort care, symptom management, and whether transfer to hospital is desired.
- Family communication should be empathetic, non-judgemental, and frame the decision as "what we can do" rather than "what we are not doing" โ avoid the term "Do Not Resuscitate" with families when possible.
- Revisit resuscitation decisions at key transitions: hospital admission, discharge, clinical deterioration, or change in care setting.
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients may have cultural obligations around death, sorry business, and family decision-making โ engage Aboriginal Health Workers and allow family-led discussions.
- Inadequate documentation is the single most common reason for inappropriate resuscitation โ ensure plans are signed, dated, current, and accessible to all care providers including after-hours staff.
Introduction & Australian Epidemiology
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was developed in the 1960s for unexpected cardiac arrest in otherwise healthy individuals. Over subsequent decades it became a default intervention applied to virtually all hospitalised patients unless explicitly documented otherwise. In contemporary Australian practice, it is recognised that CPR confers no benefit โ and often causes significant harm โ in patients with end-stage organ failure, advanced malignancy, frailty, or those in the active phase of dying.
In Australia, approximately 160,000 people die each year, with the majority occurring in hospital or residential aged care facilities. Surveys consistently show that most Australians prefer to die at home or in a hospice setting, yet fewer than 20% achieve this. A significant proportion of hospital deaths involve unwanted escalation of treatment, including CPR, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and mechanical ventilation, often because a resuscitation decision was never discussed or documented.
National data from the Australasian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC) demonstrates that survival to hospital discharge following in-hospital cardiac arrest is approximately 20โ25% overall, but falls below 5% in patients with metastatic cancer, end-stage renal failure, end-stage heart failure (NYHA Class IV), severe sepsis, or a Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) score below 30%. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival in Australia remains around 10โ12% where bystander CPR is initiated, but is negligible in patients found in aged care facilities with known terminal illness.
This topic addresses the clinical framework for appropriate resuscitation decision-making, documentation requirements across Australian jurisdictions, coordination with ambulance services, and compassionate communication with patients and families. The overarching principle is that avoiding inappropriate resuscitation is not "doing nothing" โ it is a deliberate, documented decision to redirect care towards comfort, dignity, and symptom management.
Resuscitation Status
Resuscitation status refers to the medical determination of whether CPR (including defibrillation, intubation, and advanced cardiac life support) should be attempted in the event of cardiac or respiratory arrest. It is a clinical decision made by a senior medical officer in consultation with the patient (where capable), their substitute decision-maker, and the multidisciplinary team.
When to Initiate Resuscitation Status Discussion
A resuscitation discussion should be triggered at defined clinical milestones, not left until the terminal event:
- Diagnosis of a life-limiting illness with expected trajectory of decline (e.g., metastatic cancer, end-stage COPD, motor neurone disease)
- Frailty Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) score โฅ 7 (severely frail) or Palliative Performance Scale (PPS) โค 40%
- Admission to hospital with acute deterioration of a chronic condition
- Transfer to residential aged care (transition of care)
- Referral to palliative care or hospice services
- Patient or family-initiated request to discuss end-of-life wishes
- ICU step-down when further escalation is not consistent with prognosis
Categories of Resuscitation Plan
Futility and the Clinician's Obligation
Australian medical law and ethics, guided by the Australian Medical Association (AMA) and the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM), recognise that clinicians are not obliged to provide treatment that is futile, harmful, or not clinically indicated. CPR that will not restore meaningful circulation or survival is considered medically futile. This is not a withdrawal of care โ it is a redirection towards appropriate care.
Australian Legal Framework
Resuscitation decisions are governed by a combination of common law, state/territory legislation, and professional guidelines:
- Common law: A competent adult has the right to refuse treatment, including life-sustaining treatment. This is well-established in Australian case law (e.g., Re T (Adult: Refusal of Treatment) principles adopted in Australian jurisdictions).
- State/territory guardianship and medical treatment legislation: Each jurisdiction has specific legislation governing substitute decision-making for patients without capacity (e.g., NSW Guardianship Act 1987, Vic Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016, Qld Powers of Attorney Act 1998).
- Advance Care Directives (ACDs): Legally recognised in all Australian states and territories under varying legislation. A valid ACD refusing CPR must be respected by treating clinicians, provided it applies to the current clinical situation.
- Professional standards: The Medical Board of Australia's Good Medical Practice code requires clinicians to consider the patient's wishes, provide honest information, and make decisions in the patient's best interest.
Documentation
Clear, accessible, and current documentation is the single most important factor in preventing inappropriate resuscitation. A verbal agreement with the patient or family, without formal documentation, offers no protection when emergency services arrive or an after-hours medical officer is called.
State and Territory Resuscitation Plan Forms
Each Australian jurisdiction has its own recognised documentation for resuscitation and treatment limitation decisions:
| Jurisdiction | Form / Document | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| New South Wales | Resuscitation Plan (R-Plan) / Goals of Patient Care (GOPC) | Recognised by NSW Ambulance; includes CPR status, ceiling of treatment, and preferred place of care |
| Victoria | Resuscitation Plan / Advance Care Directive (under Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016) | Must be signed by medical practitioner; Ambulance Victoria recognises valid plans |
| Queensland | Resuscitation Plan (RP) / Advance Health Directive (AHD) | Queensland Ambulance Service recognises RPs; AHD is legally binding under Powers of Attorney Act 1998 |
| South Australia | Resuscitation Plan / Advance Care Directive (under Advance Care Directives Act 2013) | ACDs have statutory recognition; SA Ambulance Service trains paramedics to identify and follow |
| Western Australia | Resuscitation Plan / Advance Health Directive (under Guardianship and Administration Act 1990) | WA Ambulance Service recognises plans; Community palliative care teams assist with documentation |
| Tasmania | Advance Care Directive / Resuscitation Plan | Under Guardianship and Administration Act 1995; Ambulance Tasmania training includes plan recognition |
| Northern Territory | Advance Personal Plan / Resuscitation Plan | Under Advance Personal Planning Act 2013; St John NT Ambulance recognises valid plans |
| ACT | Health Direction / Advance Care Directive | Under Medical Treatment (Health Directions) Act 2006; ACT Ambulance Service recognises plans |
What Must Be Documented
- Patient identification: Full name, date of birth, Medicare number, address
- Clinical basis: Primary diagnosis, comorbidities, reason for resuscitation decision
- Resuscitation status: For CPR / Not for CPR โ stated explicitly and unambiguously
- Ceiling of treatment: Specify what treatments are and are not appropriate (e.g., IV fluids: yes; ICU transfer: no; antibiotics for pneumonia: comfort measures only)
- Patient/family involvement: Who was consulted, what was discussed, and whether the patient agreed
- Medical officer signature: Signed and dated by the responsible medical officer (registrar or above in most jurisdictions)
- Review date: Resuscitation plans should be reviewed at a minimum every 90 days or with any significant change in clinical status
Common Documentation Failures
- Verbal-only agreement not committed to the recognised form
- Plan filed in the medical record but not accessible to ambulance or after-hours staff
- Outdated plan not reviewed after clinical deterioration or hospital transfer
- Incomplete documentation โ e.g., "Not for CPR" without specifying ceiling of other treatments
- Plan signed by a junior doctor without adequate senior review or clinical justification
- Failure to notify the patient's GP, community palliative care team, and regular pharmacist
Ambulance Plans
Coordination with state and territory ambulance services is a critical and frequently overlooked step in avoiding inappropriate resuscitation. In the absence of a documented plan, Australian paramedics are professionally and legally required to initiate full resuscitation. Even if a patient has a documented NFR in the hospital, this has no standing with ambulance services unless the jurisdiction-specific ambulance-recognised plan is in place.
Key Principles for Ambulance Plans
- Use the specific resuscitation/ACP form recognised by your state or territory ambulance service (see Documentation table above)
- The form must be physically accessible โ on the refrigerator (for home patients), at the bedside (for RACF patients), or electronically accessible in the ambulance dispatch system
- The form must be current (signed within the review period โ typically 90 days in most jurisdictions)
- Contact the ambulance service to register the plan if required by your jurisdiction (e.g., Ambulance Victoria's PALMedicine service, NSW Ambulance's My Health Record integration)
Treat, Refer, or Transfer Decision
Ambulance plans should clearly articulate the desired response for different clinical scenarios:
End-of-Life Medication Kits for Home
Patients dying at home should have an anticipatory medication kit available. These kits are prescribed by the GP or palliative care team and kept in the home. Paramedics may be instructed to administer these medications under the existing care plan:
Family Communication
Discussing resuscitation status with patients and families is one of the most challenging conversations in clinical practice. When done well, it provides reassurance, reduces anxiety, and ensures care aligns with the patient's values. When done poorly, it can cause lasting psychological harm, erode trust, and lead to conflict between families and the treating team.
Communication Frameworks
Evidence-based communication tools assist clinicians in structuring resuscitation conversations:
Language to Use and Avoid
| โ Avoid | โ Use Instead |
|---|---|
| "Do Not Resuscitate" / "DNR" | "We have a plan to focus on comfort and dignity" / "We will not be using machines to restart the heart" |
| "There's nothing more we can do" | "There is a lot we can do to make sure your father is comfortable and supported" |
| "We're withdrawing treatment" | "We are changing the focus of treatment to comfort" |
| "Would you like us to do everything?" | "Let me explain what treatments are available and which ones would be helpful for your mother's situation" |
| "He's a fighter; he wouldn't want to give up" | "We will continue to fight for his comfort and dignity. We will not abandon him." |
| "You need to decide now" | "Take the time you need. We can talk again tomorrow. There is no rush." |
Addressing Common Family Concerns
- "You're giving up on her": Emphasise that this is not abandonment โ "We are changing what we are doing for her, not what we are doing about her. Our team will be just as involved."
- "But she's a fighter / she wouldn't want this": Explore what the patient would have wanted. Use values-based language โ "Your mother always said she wanted to be at home and not hooked up to machines. This plan honours those wishes."
- "What if he wakes up?": Explain the clinical reality gently โ "The brain has been very severely affected. Even if the heart could be restarted, there would not be meaningful recovery."
- "Can we get a second opinion?": Always agree. Offer a palliative care consult, a second physician review, or a family meeting with the treating team. This is not adversarial โ it is part of good care.
- Guilt about "choosing" comfort care: Reframe โ "This is not your decision alone. This is a recommendation based on what is medically appropriate. We are supporting you, not burdening you with the decision."
Special Populations
Pregnancy
Paediatrics
Elderly / Frail
Renal Impairment
Immunocompromised
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations
Resuscitation and end-of-life discussions with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients and communities require deep cultural sensitivity, an understanding of Indigenous concepts of death and dying, and a commitment to self-determination in health care. Inappropriate resuscitation of Indigenous patients โ particularly in remote communities โ is a significant concern, often arising from inadequate documentation, poor communication between services, and a reluctance by non-Indigenous clinicians to initiate end-of-life conversations.
๐ References
- 1. Australian Resuscitation Council. ANZCOR Guideline 10.1 โ Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Melbourne: Australian Resuscitation Council; 2024.
- 2. Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM). Statement on Resuscitation in the Emergency Department. Melbourne: ACEM; 2022.
- 3. Australian Medical Association (AMA). Position Statement on End of Life Care 2022. Canberra: AMA; 2022.
- 4. Palliative Care Australia. National Palliative Care Standards. 5th ed. Canberra: Palliative Care Australia; 2018.
- 5. Advance Care Planning Australia. National Framework for Advance Care Planning. Melbourne: Austin Health; 2023. Available from: advancecareplanning.org.au.
- 6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Deaths in Australia. Cat. no. PHE 229. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
- 7. Resuscitation Council (UK). Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT). London: Resuscitation Council UK; 2020. Adapted for Australian use by state health departments.
- 8. NSW Health. Resuscitation Plan (R-Plan) โ Policy Directive PD2019_036. Sydney: NSW Ministry of Health; 2019.
- 9. Department of Health Victoria. Medical Treatment Planning and Decisions Act 2016 โ Clinical Guideline. Melbourne: Victorian Government; 2018.
- 10. Queensland Health. Resuscitation Plan Clinical Guideline. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2021.
- 11. Australasian Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (Aus-ROC). Annual Report on Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Australia and New Zealand. Melbourne: Aus-ROC; 2023.
- 12. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;340:c1345.
- 13. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Healing Foundation. Working with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People in End-of-Life Care: A Resource for Health Professionals. Canberra: Healing Foundation; 2021.
- 14. Australian Indigenous Doctors' Association (AIDA). End-of-Life Care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: A Framework for Practice. Canberra: AIDA; 2020.
- 15. Buck K, Detering KM, Sellars M, et al. Prevalence of advance care planning documentation in Australian health and residential aged care services. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care. 2021;11(3):306โ313.
- 16. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Aged Care Clinical Guide (Silver Book). 5th ed. Melbourne: RACGP; 2023.