Home Family Medicine Cervical Cancer Screening

Cervical Cancer Screening

📋 Key Information Summary

📋
  • Persistent infection with high-risk HPV (especially types 16 and 18) is the necessary cause of virtually all cervical cancers; HPV 16/18 account for approximately 70% of cases in Australia.
  • Since December 2017, the Pap smear has been replaced by the HPV-based Cervical Screening Test (CST) as the primary screening modality in Australia.
  • Screening is recommended for all people with a cervix aged 25–74 years, every 5 years with a negative HPV result (changed from 2-yearly Pap smears).
  • The Cervical Screening Test detects HPV DNA/RNA first; if HPV-positive, reflex liquid-based cytology (LBC) is performed on the same specimen.
  • HPV 16/18-positive results require direct referral to colposcopy regardless of cytology findings.
  • HPV-positive for other high-risk types with abnormal cytology (≥ASC-US) also requires colposcopy; if cytology is normal, repeat CST at 12 months.
  • Self-collected vaginal samples are now a validated and funded option for under-screened and never-screened individuals aged 30–74, significantly improving equity of access.
  • The National HPV Vaccination Program (Gardasil® 9) funds vaccination for ages 12–13 via school-based programmes; catch-up is available for those who missed vaccination, with the single-dose schedule adopted from 2023 for ages <25.
  • CIN 1 (LSIL) usually regresses spontaneously; CIN 2 has intermediate behaviour; CIN 3 (HSIL) is the definitive precancerous lesion requiring treatment (excision or ablation).
  • Women who are immunocompromised, HIV-positive, DES-exposed, or have a history of treatment for high-grade disease require more intensive surveillance per ASCCP-equivalent Australian guidelines.
  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women experience cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates 2–3 times higher than non-Indigenous women; culturally safe screening programmes and self-collection pathways are critical to closing this gap.
  • Exit from the National Cervical Screening Program is recommended at age 74 with two consecutive negative HPV results in the previous 10 years.

Introduction & Australian Epidemiology

Cervical cancer is one of the most preventable malignancies thanks to effective screening programmes and vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV). Australia introduced its National Cervical Screening Program (NCSP) in 1991 with two-yearly Pap smears, and transitioned in December 2017 to a five-yearly HPV-based Cervical Screening Test (CST). This transition was based on robust evidence that primary HPV testing is more sensitive than cytology alone for detecting high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), the precursors to invasive cervical cancer.

Australian Burden of Disease

  • Approximately 900–950 new cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed in Australia each year, and around 250–300 women die annually from the disease (AIHW, 2023).
  • The age-standardised incidence rate has fallen dramatically since the introduction of organised screening—from 14 per 100,000 in the early 1990s to approximately 6–7 per 100,000 currently.
  • The most common histological types are squamous cell carcinoma (~70%) and adenocarcinoma (~25%); adenocarcinoma is harder to detect by cytology but equally well detected by HPV testing.
  • Australia's HPV vaccination programme (commenced 2007 for girls, 2013 for boys) has led to measurable reductions in HPV prevalence, genital warts, and high-grade cervical abnormalities in vaccinated cohorts, with modelling predicting near-elimination of cervical cancer by 2035.

Key Differences from the Old Programme

Feature Old Programme (Pap smear) Current Programme (CST)
Primary test Cytology (Pap smear) HPV nucleic acid test
Screening interval Every 2 years Every 5 years
Age to start 18 years (or within 2 years of first sexual activity) 25 years
Age to cease 70 years 74 years
Self-collection Not available Available for ages 30–74 (expanded 2022)
Test of cure Annual cytology HPV test at 12 months post-treatment

HPV & Natural History of Cervical Neoplasia

Human Papillomavirus (HPV)

HPV is a small, non-enveloped, double-stranded DNA virus that infects basal keratinocytes of squamous epithelium. Over 200 types have been identified; approximately 14 are classified as high-risk (oncogenic) types. HPV is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide — approximately 80% of sexually active individuals will acquire at least one HPV infection in their lifetime.

High-Risk HPV Types

Category HPV Types Attributable Cervical Cancer (%)
Highest risk 16, 18 ~70%
Other high-risk 31, 33, 45, 52, 58 ~20%
Lower oncogenic potential 35, 39, 51, 56, 59, 66, 68 ~10%

Natural History: From HPV Infection to Cervical Cancer

The natural history of cervical neoplasia follows a well-characterised, multi-step process:

1
HPV Acquisition
Transmission via skin-to-skin contact, usually during sexual activity. Most infections occur within years of sexual debut. Incubation period is 1–6 months for visible warts (types 6, 11); high-risk types may be latent for years.
2
Transient Infection (~90%)
The majority of HPV infections are cleared by cell-mediated immunity within 12–24 months. No treatment is required. Persistence is the key risk factor for progression.
3
Persistent Infection (~10%)
Persistence of high-risk HPV (especially types 16, 18, 31, 33) beyond 12–24 months significantly increases the risk of developing CIN. HPV 16 has the highest rate of persistence and progression.
4
CIN 1 (LSIL)
Low-grade dysplasia — represents productive HPV infection. Approximately 60–80% regress spontaneously within 1–2 years, particularly in younger women. Approximately 10–15% persist and ~5–10% progress to CIN 2+.
5
CIN 2 / CIN 3 (HSIL)
CIN 2 is a borderline lesion (some regress, some progress). CIN 3 (carcinoma in situ) is the direct precursor to invasive cancer. Without treatment, the median time from CIN 3 to invasive cancer is estimated at 10–15 years, though this can be shorter in immunocompromised individuals.
6
Invasive Cervical Cancer
Approximately 0.5–1% of untreated CIN 3 will progress to invasive cancer. The risk varies by HPV type (HPV 16 progresses most rapidly). Once invasion occurs, the cancer follows standard staging (FIGO) and requires multimodal treatment.
⚠️
Key concept: HPV infection is necessary but not sufficient for cervical cancer development. Co-factors that increase progression risk include immunosuppression (HIV, transplant), smoking, high parity, long-term oral contraceptive use (>5 years), and co-infection with other STIs (Chlamydia trachomatis, HSV-2).

HPV Vaccination in Australia

The National Immunisation Program (NIP) funds Gardasil® 9 (nonavalent vaccine covering types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58) for:

  • Routine schedule: All adolescents aged 12–13 years, delivered as a single dose in school-based programmes (adopted from February 2023, replacing the previous 2-dose schedule for this age group).
  • Catch-up: A single dose for individuals aged <25 years who have not yet been vaccinated (catch-up funded through the NIP).
  • Older individuals / those ≥25 years: A 3-dose schedule is required if vaccination is pursued, but is not NIP-funded; approximately 0–600 for the course (private prescription).
💉
Gardasil® 9 (Nonavalent HPV Vaccine)
MSD · Recombinant 9-valent HPV vaccine
Composition VLPs for types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58
Routine dose 0.5 mL IM, single dose (ages 12–13, from Feb 2023)
Catch-up dose Single dose for those <25 years who missed vaccination
Immunocompromised ≥25 yrs 3 doses at 0, 2, and 6 months (standard 3-dose schedule)
PBS / NIP status ✔ NIP Funded (ages 12–13 school; catch-up <25)
Australian success story: Since the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme in 2007, HPV 16/18 prevalence in young Australian women has fallen by over 75%, genital wart presentations have declined by >90% in those aged <21, and high-grade cervical abnormalities have decreased significantly in vaccinated cohorts. Modelling by Hall et al. (2019) predicts cervical cancer elimination (<4 cases per 100,000 women-years) in Australia by approximately 2035.

CIN Grading & The Bethesda System

Cervical cytology in Australia is reported using a modified Bethesda System, which classifies specimens based on the presence and type of epithelial cell abnormalities. Understanding this system is essential for interpreting Cervical Screening Test results and determining appropriate clinical management.

Bethesda Reporting Categories

Category Description Approximate CIN Equivalent Clinical Significance
Negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy (NILM) Normal squamous and glandular cells; no evidence of dysplasia Normal Routine 5-yearly screening if HPV-negative
Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) Mild squamous cell changes of uncertain significance Atypical Requires HPV triage or repeat in 12 months depending on HPV result
Atypical squamous cells — cannot exclude HSIL (ASC-H) Atypical squamous cells suspicious for high-grade lesion Atypical / possible HSIL Referral to colposcopy recommended
Low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Koilocytic changes consistent with HPV effect CIN 1 Usually regresses; colposcopy if HPV 16/18 or persistent at 12 months
High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Moderate to severe dysplasia CIN 2 / CIN 3 Colposcopy required; treatment usually indicated
Squamous cell carcinoma Invasive squamous carcinoma Invasive cancer Urgent referral to gynaecological oncology
Atypical glandular cells (AGC) Atypical endocervical, endometrial, or glandular cells NOS Variable (may indicate AIS or endometrial pathology) Colposcopy + endometrial sampling (if ≥45 years or abnormal bleeding)
Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) High-grade glandular precursor lesion AIS Colposcopy + excisional biopsy; higher risk of occult invasion

Correlation: Cytology (Bethesda) vs Histology (CIN)

Cytology and histology use parallel but distinct classification systems. The correlation is:

Cytology (Bethesda) Histology (CIN) Regress (%) Persist (%) Progress (%)
LSIL CIN 1 60–80% 10–20% ~5–10%
HSIL CIN 2 30–50% 30% ~20–30%
HSIL CIN 3 Low (<10%) ~20% ~12–30% (to invasion if untreated)
ℹ️
CIN 2 — the equivocal lesion: CIN 2 has variable biological behaviour; in women aged <25, observation (conservative management with repeat colposcopy and cytology at 12 months) is often appropriate because regression rates are higher. In women ≥25, treatment is more commonly recommended, especially for confirmed CIN 2 on biopsy.

Cervical Screening Test — Who, When, and How

Who Should Be Screened?

  • All people with a cervix aged 25–74 years who have ever been sexually active (regardless of gender identity, sexual orientation, or vaccination status).
  • Screening should commence at age 25 (not 18), as HPV infections acquired before this age overwhelmingly resolve spontaneously, and screening younger women leads to unnecessary investigation without cancer prevention benefit.
  • Vaccinated individuals must still screen — the vaccine does not cover all oncogenic HPV types.

Screening Intervals and Pathways

Routine
HPV Negative
No HPV detected by the CST. Return to routine 5-yearly screening.
Repeat CST in 5 years
Requires Assessment
HPV Positive (not 16/18) + Normal Cytology
Other high-risk HPV detected but reflex cytology is NILM. Most will clear the infection.
Repeat CST in 12 months
Urgent Referral
HPV 16/18 Positive (any cytology)
Highest-risk HPV types detected. Direct to colposcopy regardless of cytology result, as the risk of CIN 2+ is significantly elevated.
Colposcopy referral

Complete Management Pathway Based on CST Results

HPV Result Reflex LBC (Cytology) Management
HPV not detected Not performed Routine screening in 5 years
HPV 16/18 detected Any (including NILM) Colposcopy referral
Other HR-HPV detected NILM Repeat CST in 12 months
Other HR-HPV detected ASC-US or LSIL Colposcopy referral
Other HR-HPV detected ASC-H, HSIL, AGC, AIS, or SCC Colposcopy referral (urgent if SCC)
Other HR-HPV detected at 12 months Any Colposcopy referral
HPV not detected at 12 months Return to 5-yearly screening

Collection Method

  • Clinician-collected sample: Traditional Cervex-Brush® or similar device, with sampling of the transformation zone. Specimen placed in liquid-based cytology (LBC) medium. This remains the gold-standard collection method.
  • Self-collected vaginal sample: Since July 2022, all individuals aged 30–74 who are under-screened (never screened or ≥2 years overdue) or never-screened may self-collect a vaginal swab for HPV testing. This uses a dry flocked swab inserted 4–5 cm into the vagina. Self-collection detects HPV with high sensitivity (~75–85% for CIN 2+, versus ~90% for clinician-collected) and is significantly more acceptable to many underscreened women.
⚠️
Important limitation: Self-collected samples test for HPV only — they do not provide reflex cytology. If the self-collected sample is HPV-positive, the patient must attend for a clinician-collected sample (with LBC) or be referred directly for colposcopy (if HPV 16/18 detected). Self-collection is not appropriate for symptomatic patients (e.g., abnormal bleeding) who should undergo clinician assessment.

Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) Items

MBS Item Description
69316 Cervical Screening Test — clinician-collected (routine screening)
69317 Cervical Screening Test — self-collected (eligible patients)
69320 Follow-up CST for HPV-positive patients (12-month repeat)
35524 Colposcopy with directed biopsy
35530 Excisional treatment of the cervix (LLETZ / LEEP)

Test of Cure After Treatment

Following treatment (excision or ablation) for CIN 2/3 or AIS:

  • First follow-up CST (HPV test) at 12 months post-treatment.
  • If HPV-negative at 12 months: repeat at 24 months post-treatment (second test of cure).
  • If both negative: return to 5-yearly routine screening.
  • If HPV-positive at any test of cure: colposcopy referral.
  • If margins of excision specimen are involved by CIN 2+ or AIS: closer surveillance recommended (CST at 6 months + colposcopy).

Exit from the National Cervical Screening Program

  • At age 74 years, with documented two consecutive negative HPV tests within the preceding 10 years (i.e., two negative CSTs at routine 5-yearly intervals).
  • Women who have had a total hysterectomy (with removal of the cervix) for benign indications, with no history of CIN 2+, do not require further screening.
  • Women who have had a total hysterectomy with a prior history of CIN 2+ should have annual vaginal cuff cytology for 25 years following treatment (or until age 74).

Screening in Special & Underscreened Populations

Underscreened and Never-Screened Women

Approximately 30% of eligible Australian women are not up to date with cervical screening. Key barriers include lack of awareness, cultural and language barriers, previous negative healthcare experiences (including sexual assault), geographic remoteness, and cost (particularly for those without Medicare access). The NCSP Register sends reminder letters, but many women do not respond.

💡
Self-collection is the game-changer: Since the July 2022 expansion, all eligible women aged 30–74 who are never-screened or overdue (≥2 years since last CST, or ≥4 years since last Pap) can self-collect a vaginal HPV sample in the clinic (or at home via approved programmes). Practice nurses and GPs should proactively offer self-collection to all overdue patients. Data from the Victorian Cytology Service show that self-collection uptake has significantly increased screening rates among previously underscreened women.
🛡️

Immunocompromised Women

Includes: HIV-positive, organ transplant recipients, those on immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., biologics, high-dose corticosteroids, chemotherapy).
Key difference: HPV infections are more likely to persist and progress more rapidly. CIN may develop at any age, including <25 years.
Recommendations:
  • HIV-positive women: commence screening within 1 year of sexual debut or at age 18 (whichever is earlier) — not at 25 as per general population.
  • Screen annually (not 5-yearly).
  • Organ transplant recipients: commence screening at 1 year post-transplant or per transplant-unit protocol; annual CST.
  • If abnormalities are detected, treat at lower thresholds (CIN 1 may warrant treatment in severely immunocompromised patients).
👧

Young Women (<25 Years)

Key principle: Do not screen before age 25 in the general population. HPV infections in young women are overwhelmingly transient, and screening leads to unnecessary colposcopy and excisional treatments that may increase future obstetric risks (preterm birth, cervical incompetence).
Exception: If clinically symptomatic (persistent abnormal bleeding, post-coital bleeding), investigate regardless of age with appropriate examination and consider HPV testing / colposcopy.
🤰

Pregnant Women

Screening: CST can safely be performed during pregnancy (preferably in the first trimester). Colposcopy for HPV 16/18-positive results can be performed during pregnancy by an experienced colposcopist.
Treatment: Excisional and ablative treatments are contraindicated during pregnancy. If CIN 2/3 is diagnosed, defer treatment until ≥6 weeks postpartum. Repeat colposcopy at 36 weeks if CIN 3 is present.
Postpartum: Perform CST at 6 weeks postpartum; regression of CIN 1 is common during pregnancy.
👵

Older Women (>65 Years)

Key point: Women over 65 who have been adequately screened (two negative HPV tests in previous 10 years) may safely exit the programme. However, women who have never been screened or are under-screened should be encouraged to have a CST at any age until two consecutive negative results are obtained.
Risk: Cervical cancer in older women is often diagnosed at a later stage because screening has ceased. Maintain vigilance for symptoms (postmenopausal bleeding, vaginal discharge).

Women Who Have Had a Hysterectomy

  • Total hysterectomy for benign disease, no history of CIN 2+: No further screening required.
  • Total hysterectomy with history of CIN 2+: Vaginal cuff cytology annually for 25 years after treatment of the most recent CIN 2+ lesion, or until age 74.
  • Subtotal (supracervical) hysterectomy: Continue routine CST as per guidelines (cervix remains in situ).

Women with Symptoms

🚨
Red flag symptoms: Post-coital bleeding, intermenstrual bleeding, postmenopausal bleeding, persistent vaginal discharge, pelvic pain, or dyspareunia are NOT indications for routine screening — these require clinical assessment, examination, and appropriate investigation (which may include a CST but should not be limited to it). Refer for urgent gynaecological assessment if cancer is suspected.

Investigations

Primary Screening Test

Essential
Cervical Screening Test (HPV + reflex LBC)
Liquid-based cytology medium specimen. Processed by accredited pathology laboratories (e.g., Douglass Hanly Moir, Sullivan Nicolaides, PathWest). Results typically available within 7–14 business days. Self-collected samples tested at same laboratories using validated PCR-based HPV assays (Cobas® HPV, Aptima® HPV, or BD Onclarity™).
Available
Colposcopy
Optical magnification (6–40×) of the cervix with acetic acid (3–5%) and Lugol's iodine (Schiller test). Available in specialist gynaecology clinics, family planning clinics, and some hospital outpatient departments. Waiting times vary: 2–6 weeks in metropolitan areas, potentially longer in regional/remote areas. MBS item 35524.
Available
Cervical Biopsy (Punch / Cone)
Directed biopsy at colposcopy for histological confirmation. Punch biopsies taken from the most abnormal area. Cone biopsy (cold-knife cone or LLETZ/LEEP) for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Processed by specialist gynaecological pathologists.
Specialist
LLETZ / LEEP (Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone)
Electrosurgical excision for treatment of CIN 2/3. Performed under local anaesthesia in colposcopy clinic. Provides tissue for histological assessment including margin status. MBS item 35530.
Referral
Gynaecological Oncology Referral
Required for confirmed or suspected invasive cervical cancer, AIS with positive margins, or microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour staging (FIGO 2018), MRI pelvis, CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, and PET-CT for staging. Available at all state-based gynaecological oncology centres (e.g., RPA Women's Health, RBWH, Royal Women's Melbourne, QEH Adelaide).

Management of Abnormal Results

At Colposcopy — Biopsy and Treatment Thresholds

Colposcopy / Histology Finding Recommended Action
Normal colposcopy, HPV positive (non-16/18) Endocervical curettage; repeat CST in 12 months
CIN 1 (LSIL) on biopsy Observation — repeat colposcopy and CST in 12 months (conservative management preferred in women <30)
CIN 2 on biopsy (confirmed by specialist pathologist) If age <25: observation with 12-monthly review. If ≥25: excision (LLETZ) recommended; observation may be considered in select cases.
CIN 3 (HSIL) on biopsy Excisional treatment (LLETZ / LEEP). Ablation (cryotherapy/cold coagulation) only if transformation zone fully visible and no glandular abnormality.
AIS on biopsy Excisional cone biopsy (diagnostic). If margins negative and patient completed family, consider hysterectomy. Fertility-sparing: excision with negative margins + close follow-up.
Microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma (<3 mm depth, Stage IA1) Referral to gynaecological oncology. Cone biopsy may be sufficient if margins clear; lymphovascular invasion assessment essential.
Invasive cancer (≥Stage IA2) Urgent referral to gynaecological oncology for staging and treatment planning.

Excisional Treatment Details

🏥
LLETZ / LEEP Excision
Large Loop Excision of the Transformation Zone
Setting Outpatient colposcopy clinic, local anaesthesia (1–2% lignocaine with adrenaline)
Procedure Excision of transformation zone using thin wire loop with electrosurgical current (cut/coag blend)
Success rate ~90–95% clearance of CIN 2/3 in a single procedure
Complications Intraoperative/postoperative haemorrhage (3–5%), cervical stenosis (rare), preterm birth in future pregnancies (relative risk ~1.5–2× with excision depth >10 mm)
MBS item 35530
⚠️
Obstetric implications: Excisional treatment of the cervix (especially excision depth >15 mm or repeat excision) is associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (before 37 weeks) and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) in future pregnancies. In women who have not yet completed their family, minimise excision depth and consider conservative management for CIN 2 where appropriate. Always document excision dimensions in the operative report.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Considerations

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women experience disproportionately high rates of cervical cancer and cervical cancer mortality compared with non-Indigenous Australian women. This inequity reflects a complex interplay of historical, systemic, and cultural barriers to screening, follow-up, and treatment. Closing the gap in cervical cancer outcomes requires a multipronged, culturally safe approach.

Incidence & Mortality
Indigenous women have approximately 2.5 times the incidence of cervical cancer and 3.8 times the mortality of non-Indigenous women. Five-year survival is significantly lower (62% vs 74%), largely due to later-stage diagnosis.
Screening Participation
National screening participation for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women is approximately 36–40% (compared with ~57% for non-Indigenous women) — well below the NCSP target of 70%. In remote communities, participation may be as low as 20–30%.
Self-Collection as a Key Strategy
Self-collected vaginal HPV testing is a critical equity tool. It removes the barrier of a clinician-performed internal examination, which is a major deterrent for many Indigenous women, particularly in communities with few female health practitioners. GP practices and Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) should proactively offer self-collection to all eligible Indigenous women who are overdue.
Cultural Safety
Screening should be offered in a culturally safe environment by practitioners who understand the social and emotional wellbeing context. Use of female health practitioners, "women's business" awareness, community-controlled health services, and avoidance of shame-based messaging are essential. Yarning-based approaches to health promotion improve engagement.
Geographic Barriers
In remote and very remote areas of the Northern Territory, Western Australia, and Queensland, access to colposcopy services is severely limited. Telecolposcopy programmes and visiting specialist services (e.g., through RHDAustralia and state-based outreach programmes) are vital. Some patients require interstate travel for colposcopy and treatment, which introduces significant logistical and social barriers.
HPV Vaccination
School-based HPV vaccination rates for Indigenous adolescents are lower than for non-Indigenous adolescents (approximately 77% vs 85% for at least one dose). Community-based catch-up vaccination delivered through ACCHOs is an important complementary strategy. Single-dose Gardasil® 9 schedule should improve completion rates.
Follow-Up & Navigation
Loss to follow-up after abnormal results is significantly higher in Indigenous women. Case management, patient navigation, and recall systems within ACCHOs improve colposcopy attendance and treatment completion. Integration of cervical screening into broader women's health checks (including STI screening, chronic disease management, and antenatal care) improves uptake.
Key Resources
Australian Government Department of Health — National Cervical Screening Program: specific Indigenous resources. RHDAustralia (Menzies School of Health Research) — clinical guidelines relevant to remote Indigenous women. Cancer Council Australia — community education materials co-designed with Indigenous communities.
🚨
Action for every GP practice: Audit your patient register to identify Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women aged 25–74 who are overdue for cervical screening. Contact them proactively and offer self-collection as the first option. Partner with local ACCHOs and Aboriginal Health Workers to deliver culturally safe screening programmes.

📚 References

  1. 1. Australian Government Department of Health and Aged Care. National Cervical Screening Program: Guidelines for the Management of Screen-Detected Abnormalities, Screening in Specific Populations and Investigation of Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding. Canberra: Department of Health; 2023.
  2. 2. Cancer Council Australia Cervical Cancer Screening Guidelines Working Party. National Cervical Screening Program: Recommendations for Clinical Practice. Sydney: Cancer Council Australia; 2023. Available at: wiki.cancer.org.au.
  3. 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Cervical Screening in Australia 2023. Cat. no. CAN 139. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  4. 4. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework: Cervical Cancer. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  5. 5. Hall MT, Simms KT, Lew JB, et al. The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2019;4(1):e19–e27.
  6. 6. Machalek DA, Garland SM, Brotherton JML, et al. Very low prevalence of vaccine human papillomavirus types among 18- to 35-year old Australian women 9 years following implementation of vaccination. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(9):1398–1407.
  7. 7. Brotherton JML, Budd AC, Drennan K, et al. Elimination of cervical cancer in Australia: progress and projections. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023;63(3):305–311.
  8. 8. Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, et al. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(2):e191–e203.
  9. 9. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National Cervical Screening Program: Self-Collection Policy. Canberra: NHMRC; 2022.
  10. 10. Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG). College Statement: Cervical Screening in Pregnancy. C-Obs 33. Melbourne: RANZCOG; 2021.
  11. 11. Mbatani N, Adams T, Michelow P, et al. Self-collected human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening in underscreened populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;160(1):40–51.
  12. 12. Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI). Australian Immunisation Handbook. Australian Government Department of Health; 2024. Updated HPV chapter (single-dose schedule).
  13. 13. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Cancer in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People of Australia. Cat. no. CAN 108. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  14. 14. Currow DC, You H, Aranda S, et al. Cervical screening outcomes in Indigenous women in the Northern Territory: a population-based study. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2022;46(3):318–324.
  15. 15. Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102–131.
for PBS scripts. Utilise ACCHS pharmacies and Remote Area Aboriginal Health Worker programs for medication supply in remote areas. Avoid initiating benzodiazepines; support holistic pain management including community-based exercise programs.
Preventive health
Promote bone health: encourage vitamin D supplementation (1000 IU daily in deficient individuals), smoking cessation support, reduction of alcohol intake, and weight-bearing exercise. MBS Item 715 health checks provide a structured opportunity to assess bone health, screen for osteoporosis risk factors, and discuss musculoskeletal health in a culturally safe context.

Quick Reference: Differential Diagnosis at a Glance

Costovertebral dysfunction
Paracetamol ± NSAID; manual therapy
2–6 weeks
Provocable on palpation; no red flags
Thoracic compression fracture
Paracetamol; ± calcitonin; DXA + osteoporosis Rx
6–12 weeks healing
Elderly; osteoporosis; acute onset
ACS (posterior MI)
Aspirin 300 mg, GTN, heparin; urgent PCI
Time-critical
ECG, troponin; CV risk factors
Aortic dissection
IV labetalol; urgent CT aortogram; surgery (Type A)
Time-critical
Tearing pain; BP differential >20 mmHg
Vertebral osteomyelitis
IV antibiotics (vancomycin + ceftriaxone initially); ID consult
6 weeks IV antibiotics
Fever, elevated CRP, IV drug use
Biliary colic / cholecystitis
Paracetamol ± morphine; lap cholecystectomy
Surgical within 72 h (cholecystitis)
RUQ/infrascapular; post-prandial; RUQ US

📚 References

  1. 1. Briggs AM, Smith AJ, Straker LM, Bragge P. Thoracic spine pain in the general population: prevalence, incidence and associated factors in children, adolescents and adults. A systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009;10:77.
  2. 2. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). Evidence-based management of acute musculoskeletal pain. Canberra: NHMRC; 2003 (updated 2020).
  3. 3. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Performance Framework: Summary report 2023. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  4. 4. Deyo RA, Rainville J, Kent DL. What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain? JAMA. 1992;268(6):760–765.
  5. 5. Stochkendahl MJ, Kjaer P, Hartvigsen J, et al. National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy. Europ Spine J. 2018;27(1):60–75.
  6. 6. Erwin WM, Jackson PC, Homonko DA. Innervation of the human costovertebral joint: implications for clinical back pain syndromes. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000;23(6):395–403.
  7. 7. Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP). Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 9th edn. Melbourne: RACGP; 2018 (updated 2023).
  8. 8. Hirsch JA, Singh V, Falco FJE, et al. Thoracic facet joint interventions. Pain Physician. 2016;19(4):E581–E593.
  9. 9. Erwin WM, Jackson PC. The costovertebral joint: anatomy, biomechanics, and clinical significance in thoracic back pain syndromes. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2003;47(2):112–120.
  10. 10. Strayer RJ, Gunnerson JM, Brown LH, et al. Aortic dissection: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Aust Crit Care. 2019;32(2):144–153.
  11. 11. Ombregt L. A system of orthopaedic medicine. 3rd edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2013. Chapter 18: Thoracic spine.
  12. 12. Lin CC, Chen KH, Li DM, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of patients presenting with thoracic back pain to the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas. 2020;32(5):805–811.
for PBS-listed medicines at participating pharmacies.
Cultural safety
Engagement with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) is essential. Cultural safety training for non-Indigenous clinicians, use of Aboriginal Health Workers and Liaison Officers, and incorporation of traditional healing practices alongside Western medicine improve treatment adherence and outcomes. Avoidance of eye contact, respect for gender-sensitive examination practices, and understanding of sorry business protocols are critical elements of culturally safe care.
Medication adherence
Complex DMARD regimens with frequent monitoring requirements present adherence challenges. Long-acting depot injections (e.g., methotrexate SC) may improve adherence compared to oral regimens. Community pharmacy partnerships through the Indigenous Pharmacy Programmes improve medication management.
Specific conditions
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) requires secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin G (BPG) 1.2 MU IM every 3–4 weeks for a minimum of 10 years or until age 21 (whichever is longer). RHD registers (e.g., NT RHD Register) facilitate recall and follow-up. The Australian RHD Endgame Strategy targets elimination by 2031.
Referral pathways
Referral through ACCHOs and Aboriginal Hospital Liaison Officers (AHLOs) improves engagement. The Specialist Outreach Assistance Programme provides funded specialist visits to remote communities. NT, WA, and QLD have specific rheumatology outreach programmes targeting Indigenous communities.

📚 References

  1. 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Autoimmune disease in Australia. Cat. no. PHE 312. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  2. 2. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(7):924–939.
  3. 3. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alber K, et al. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(6):736–745.
  4. 4. Chung SA, Langford CA, Maz M, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(11):1583–1599.
  5. 5. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18.
  6. 6. Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI). Australian Immunisation Handbook. Australian Government Department of Health; 2024. Available from: immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au.
  7. 7. Rheumatic Heart Disease Australia (RHDAustralia). The 2020 Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. 3rd ed. Darwin: Menzies School of Health Research; 2020.
  8. 8. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). PBS Schedule. Australian Government Department of Health. Available from: pbs.gov.au. Accessed 2024.
  9. 9. Agarwal S, Cunnington J, Nossent J. Autoimmune disease in Indigenous Australians: a systematic review. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(12):1487–1498.
  10. 10. Pisetsky DS. Antinuclear antibody testing — misunderstood or misused? Clin Immunol. 2023;255:109717.
  11. 11. Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, et al. Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(11):1771–1782.
  12. 12. Ledingham J, Deighton C; British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Audit and Guidelines Working Group. Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNFα blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2005;44(2):155–158.
  13. 13. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2023 (updated).
for PBS-listed medicines at participating pharmacies.
Cultural safety
Engagement with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisations (ACCHOs) is essential. Cultural safety training for non-Indigenous clinicians, use of Aboriginal Health Workers and Liaison Officers, and incorporation of traditional healing practices alongside Western medicine improve treatment adherence and outcomes. Avoidance of eye contact, respect for gender-sensitive examination practices, and understanding of sorry business protocols are critical elements of culturally safe care.
Medication adherence
Complex DMARD regimens with frequent monitoring requirements present adherence challenges. Long-acting depot injections (e.g., methotrexate SC) may improve adherence compared to oral regimens. Community pharmacy partnerships through the Indigenous Pharmacy Programmes improve medication management.
Specific conditions
Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) requires secondary prophylaxis with benzathine penicillin G (BPG) 1.2 MU IM every 3–4 weeks for a minimum of 10 years or until age 21 (whichever is longer). RHD registers (e.g., NT RHD Register) facilitate recall and follow-up. The Australian RHD Endgame Strategy targets elimination by 2031.
Referral pathways
Referral through ACCHOs and Aboriginal Hospital Liaison Officers (AHLOs) improves engagement. The Specialist Outreach Assistance Programme provides funded specialist visits to remote communities. NT, WA, and QLD have specific rheumatology outreach programmes targeting Indigenous communities.

📚 References

  1. 1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW). Autoimmune disease in Australia. Cat. no. PHE 312. Canberra: AIHW; 2023.
  2. 2. Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(7):924–939.
  3. 3. Fanouriakis A, Kostopoulou M, Alber K, et al. 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(6):736–745.
  4. 4. Chung SA, Langford CA, Maz M, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the management of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2021;73(11):1583–1599.
  5. 5. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bijlsma JWJ, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18.
  6. 6. Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation (ATAGI). Australian Immunisation Handbook. Australian Government Department of Health; 2024. Available from: immunisationhandbook.health.gov.au.
  7. 7. Rheumatic Heart Disease Australia (RHDAustralia). The 2020 Australian guideline for prevention, diagnosis, and management of acute rheumatic fever and rheumatic heart disease. 3rd ed. Darwin: Menzies School of Health Research; 2020.
  8. 8. Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS). PBS Schedule. Australian Government Department of Health. Available from: pbs.gov.au. Accessed 2024.
  9. 9. Agarwal S, Cunnington J, Nossent J. Autoimmune disease in Indigenous Australians: a systematic review. Int J Rheum Dis. 2021;24(12):1487–1498.
  10. 10. Pisetsky DS. Antinuclear antibody testing — misunderstood or misused? Clin Immunol. 2023;255:109717.
  11. 11. Bertsias GK, Tektonidou M, Amoura Z, et al. Joint European League Against Rheumatism and European Renal Association–European Dialysis and Transplant Association (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) recommendations for the management of adult and paediatric lupus nephritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(11):1771–1782.
  12. 12. Ledingham J, Deighton C; British Society for Rheumatology Standards, Audit and Guidelines Working Group. Update on the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines for prescribing TNFα blockers in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2005;44(2):155–158.
  13. 13. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). National statement on ethical conduct in human research. Canberra: NHMRC; 2023 (updated).